Will The Kids Be Alright?

Van Gaal's winning record with youth might be the real reason for his appointment by the Glazers

Assessing the lay of the land at Old Trafford on Friday, Paul Scholes became the latest inviolable name associated with the club to miss the giant white elephant skulking in the car park.

 

It's everywhere, in fact. It was in United's team sheet yesterday at the Stadium of Light. It lumbered on next to Michael Keane when Chris Smalling hobbled off, again. It was sat next to Louis Van Gaal - no stooge? - when he talked about United's lack of creative passing.

 

Avi Glazer and co should give serious thought to taking over a small country and setting up a totalitarian state. Do United have a small Stasi located in the bowels of that massive stadium, working day and night to 'discourage' negative pronouncements on the parasitic effect they have on the club?

 

Scholes, Neville et al were brought up in the standard United manner. The club is bigger than all those who walk down Sir Alex Ferguson Way. They recognise their forbearance and act accordingly when passing comment. That's not the same as keeping your head below the parapet. But the Glazers, cowards that they are, feed off the parsimony. They don't badmouth anybody - because it's bad for business.

 

The reason Van Gaal excited fans - and gets City fans switching the match on at 4pm, no less - is because he's cut from the same cloth as them. He refers to the board as 'my directors'. He gets in fights with people like Uli Hoeness. His principles are all-encompassing.

 

And he believes in youth. His pride at Xavi and Iniesta's achievements was evident in his interview with Gary Neville last week. He likes to remind people of what he did with Thomas Mueller, Holger Badstuber, David Alaba and Toni Kroos at Bayern. He nearly won a second Champions League with Ajax - with the same squad that he led to victory over Milan the year prior.

 

Everyone sees the connection, but stories of Angel di Maria cloud what could be the Glazers' real motivation for hiring Van Gaal. Sure, he's demanded better players. But he's also played Tyler Blackett and Michael Keane. He'll probably give Tom Lawrence and definitely James Wilson a chance, both being included in the season's first team squad. Jesse Lingard will probably also make an appearance.



Do players like James Wilson represent the future for United under the Glazers?

 

In the case of Keane and Blackett, his hand's rather been forced by a shocking lack of depth. But beneath United's floundering first team, their under 21 side remains strong. They were only beaten to the league title by Chelsea last season and have started this season well in second position. Further down the age bracket, six of the eleven current under-18 players have been capped by England.

 

The rumours of Welbeck's wishes to depart are offset a little by the superb form of Wilson, who netted five in six in last season's UEFA Youth League and seven in nine in the U21 Premier League. His two goals versus Hull City last season prompted an uncharacteristically sentimental outburst from Giggs, interim coach at the time. 

 

United were handed a relatively easy fixture list to open their season with - the first ten sides they play finished, on average, in 16th place last season. So this is undoubtedly the time to get youngsters like Blackett, Lingard and Keane involved.

 

Van Gaal will effusively reject any suggestion of manipulation. He will do the job his way, as noted during the club's marathon timetable around America midsummer. And it's true there was no one as good as Van Gaal immediately available when the club decided there was no substitute for regular, sustained success.

 

But instead of dreaming of the Bayern squad full of internationals playing breakneck football, or the Dutch-Brazilian fusion going on at Barcelona under his guidance, perhaps United fans should cast their eyes towards this year's Netherlands side.

A mix of youth and technical proficiency, sprinkled with stardust, that Van Gaal found a way of exploiting for delivering results. Sound familiar?

Picture thanks to the Telegraph

Loose Fixtures

Clubs that choose their own fixtures could improve player fitness, reduce injuries and make the Premier League more entertaining

Somewhere, in an office in a quiet suburban backwater, a printer smoothly deposits a sheaf of A4, around a quarter of an inch in depth, into the hand of a man wearing a slightly creased shirt. He has his top button undone.

The man sits back in his chair for a moment, fishing for his cigarettes in his breast pocket with forefinger and thumb, perusing the first page with a slight squint. He is getting older, and this is the nineteenth year he has done this job. A coffee in a coffee-coloured plastic vending cup cools on his cluttered desk. He frowns, exhales loudly and flicks through pages.

Then his eyes stop. He stares, and then checks his watch. Then his diary. There is a small cross and 'LS' is marked next to the date. He checks the sheet again. He checks his diary again. He drops his cigarettes on the desk and turns back to his computer, and opens his email.

Someone has beaten him to it. There is one new unread email in his inbox, and it reads:

'El Clasico - Luis is back!!!'

The man balls a fist and swears jubilantly. Outside, nothing has changed.

That's what you'll get when you leave the idea of the random fixture generator to an overactive imagination, anyway. In truth, whilst it's probably not without its share of quirks, there's probably less smoking and less swearing. And a paperless environment, in modern climes.

So many unfortunate pictures of Luis Suarez to chew over.

But sometimes there's a fixture so good, at just the right moment, that you want to raise an eyebrow at the sheer improbability of it all. It's a fair bet this season's has already happened. In Spain, the first clasico falls on the first day Luis Suarez (above) is allowed to train with his new club after that ban for what's been amusingly dubbed the most expensive Italian he'll probably ever eat.

Irrespective of emotional reactions here, the return of Suarez could probably not be better timed. He may not play as he is not supposed to even train during his ban - but you can bet Barcelona will try to find a way around that particular predicament, even if it involves him training in private, away from the club and staff. Will he get 15 minutes? If he's even halfway fit, and it's a tight contest...

No doubt that it is a coincidence - but is there some merit in considering the unthinkable and letting clubs choose when some of their games are played?

There are plenty of good sporting ones - for one, many European trams, and particularly English ones, are breathing hard as they reach the final sprint of a long season, and fatigue undoubtedly plays a part in deciding outcomes in tight games where previously a draw may have beckoned.

That makes the game interesting. But what about the various flights clubs have to make when making up European games? Teams in the Champions League have to fly to and from countries in the space of 48 hours before weekend matches. The matches aren't going to go away - but what about giving each team, say, three matches they can definitely move once the fixtures are announced?

Each team's decision would be binding - i.e the opposing team would not be able to overrule - and this would be communicated to interested parties in advance (e.g the ubiquitous television networks involved in European football's fixture list sequencing).

This could be particularly useful for those clubs on the accursed Thursday-Sunday routine when midweek European trips to far-flung Greek/ Ukrainian/ Russian clubs mean longer returns and recoveries, especially in midwinter. Teams such as Spurs, who have been on the brink of regular Champions League qualification for the last decade, could utilise the policy to trade in some of their trickier away games for easier matches or even a bye weekend, should the fixture list allow it.

For teams struggling to meet the demands of the Premier League or those facing up to relegation, a canny perusal of the fixtures before the start of the seasons could establish which games to move to give players a break, or breaking a chain of difficult matches to prevent fatigue and low morale setting in after a series of poor results.

 

There could also be a benefit to reducing the number of injuries in teams. Several clubs may benefit from moving games out of the hectic Christmas period, when congestion is common and players carry injuries over into the new year as European competitions start again. Clubs given the opportunity to move these could see players return from injury quicker and pick up less 'niggly' injuries - which seriously hindered Arsenal's prospects last season, for example.

From an entertainment perspective, very little in practice would actually change - in fact it might be arguable that the league may actually get more competitive as all teams would be able to manipulate their performance to some extent, which could produce some interesting results come May. Although Spurs would still probably come fifth.

Picture thanks to Sky Sports